<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://youth.e-consultation.org/guide/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=RolePlayCitJury</id>
		<title>RolePlayCitJury - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://youth.e-consultation.org/guide/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=RolePlayCitJury"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://youth.e-consultation.org/guide/index.php?title=RolePlayCitJury&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-12T06:07:58Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.27.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://youth.e-consultation.org/guide/index.php?title=RolePlayCitJury&amp;diff=3305&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>davenewman at 21:28, 14 December 2004</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://youth.e-consultation.org/guide/index.php?title=RolePlayCitJury&amp;diff=3305&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2004-12-14T21:28:21Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;==Role playing scenario 2==&lt;br /&gt;
A citizens' jury on how to care for the elderly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Q1. What are your expectations of consultation?&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table border=1 cellpadding=2 cellspacing=0&amp;gt;&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Jury members&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Implementing bodies&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Groups giving evidence&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;tr valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*full and honest information&lt;br /&gt;
*not too much detail or technical arguement&lt;br /&gt;
*some support with information collection&lt;br /&gt;
*not to be influenced by powerful special interests&lt;br /&gt;
*transparancy&lt;br /&gt;
*reasoned outcome taking account of our views&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*worried that expectations will be raised&lt;br /&gt;
*worried that the verdict may go against us&lt;br /&gt;
*may get approval for our plans&lt;br /&gt;
*the jury may get a better understanding of the constraints under which we work&lt;br /&gt;
*we may get some good ideas, we may get some bad ideas&lt;br /&gt;
*it may help us to design a policy that we will get credit for&lt;br /&gt;
*may mobilise opposition&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*time to present our case&lt;br /&gt;
*fair hearing&lt;br /&gt;
*action plan adressing our concerns&lt;br /&gt;
*sufficient resource commitments&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Q2. To what extent are your needs met by the ways the consultation is conducted?&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table border=1 cellpadding=2 cellspacing=0&amp;gt;&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Jury members&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Implementing bodies&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Groups giving evidence&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;tr valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*representing the voice of the majority&lt;br /&gt;
*taking into account special interests&lt;br /&gt;
*must recognise our role&lt;br /&gt;
*don't waste our input&lt;br /&gt;
*keep us informed of roll-out&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*could go either way&lt;br /&gt;
*may not like what we hear&lt;br /&gt;
*we can't manage and control the outcome&lt;br /&gt;
*the outcome is difficult to ignore&lt;br /&gt;
*may attract adverse media attention&lt;br /&gt;
*may be difficult to organise&lt;br /&gt;
*open to capture by advocacy groups&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*get heard&lt;br /&gt;
*may not be implemented&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>davenewman</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>