<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://youth.e-consultation.org/guide/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=RolePlayDocument</id>
		<title>RolePlayDocument - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://youth.e-consultation.org/guide/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=RolePlayDocument"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://youth.e-consultation.org/guide/index.php?title=RolePlayDocument&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-12T05:59:23Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.27.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://youth.e-consultation.org/guide/index.php?title=RolePlayDocument&amp;diff=3304&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>davenewman at 22:33, 14 December 2004</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://youth.e-consultation.org/guide/index.php?title=RolePlayDocument&amp;diff=3304&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2004-12-14T22:33:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;==Role playing scenario 1==&lt;br /&gt;
Consultation documents on a road-widening scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Q1. What are your expectations of consultation?&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table border=1 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2 &amp;gt;&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Residents&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Government&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Road users&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;tr valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*a voice&lt;br /&gt;
*veto&lt;br /&gt;
*transparent&lt;br /&gt;
*effective&lt;br /&gt;
*democratic but cognisent of special interests&lt;br /&gt;
*we want to be informed&lt;br /&gt;
*we want to be heard and respected&lt;br /&gt;
*we don't want the new road&lt;br /&gt;
*environmental and other consequences taken into account&lt;br /&gt;
*joined up consultation (with other interested groups)&lt;br /&gt;
*at our convenience&lt;br /&gt;
*cost neutral&lt;br /&gt;
*involving our local representatives&lt;br /&gt;
*WE CARE&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*screen our plans for problems or undesirable consequences that we have not identified&lt;br /&gt;
*get approval for our plans&lt;br /&gt;
*inform the public of our plans and why they are such a good idea&lt;br /&gt;
*manage the process&lt;br /&gt;
*satisfy our constituents wishes&lt;br /&gt;
*have others take the blame&lt;br /&gt;
*say that since we've done consultation our plans are sound&lt;br /&gt;
*listen, up to a point...&lt;br /&gt;
*be perceived to be listening&lt;br /&gt;
*comply with statutory requirements&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*access&lt;br /&gt;
*capacity to do/get to job&lt;br /&gt;
*listen to us first&lt;br /&gt;
*rational decision&lt;br /&gt;
*minimize cost&lt;br /&gt;
*information: analysis of costs and benefits&lt;br /&gt;
*a wider road&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Q2. To what extent are your needs met by the ways the consultation is conducted?&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table border=1 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2 &amp;gt;&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Residents&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Government&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Road users&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;tr valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*we prefer individual letters&lt;br /&gt;
*newspaper advertisements are not seen&lt;br /&gt;
*we haven't time to read long plans - need a summary&lt;br /&gt;
*why should we have to find out the details&lt;br /&gt;
*marginalise those who are not literate (or middle class with influence!)&lt;br /&gt;
*doesn't let us organise with others&lt;br /&gt;
*resource intensive&lt;br /&gt;
*may slip something inmportant past us&lt;br /&gt;
*information is one-way only. Doesn't really let us make suggestions or take into account or views&lt;br /&gt;
*it's all decided anyway&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*big resource drain&lt;br /&gt;
*they don't read them!&lt;br /&gt;
*no guarantee of getting responses from the respondents we want&lt;br /&gt;
*no guarantee of getting the responses that agrre with us that we want&lt;br /&gt;
*we can do it over xmas or in the july holiday&lt;br /&gt;
*we can sometimes get detailed and useful feedback&lt;br /&gt;
*can potentially reach a wide audience&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* + everyone knows about it&lt;br /&gt;
* - time-consuming&lt;br /&gt;
* + easier for business organisations to respond&lt;br /&gt;
* mobilisational bias&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>davenewman</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>