Difference between revisions of "Expectations for E-consultation"

Revision as of 16:28, 16 April 2007

The Consulters

This was the first e-consultation ever conducted by the Wheel. Therefore, the researcher team were keen to identify initial expectations of the consulters for the E-Consultation.

The Wheel's Expectations

Here is the Wheel's expected advantages of using e-technology:

"I think expectations from the point of view from the Wheel is that we would learn and experience another method of reaching out the clients that we would seek to service or facilitate. Our expectation would be that it would improve the opportunity to do that because it is breaking away from traditional methods, which we have had problems with, where you can’t get everyone in a room. So by using a virtual medium we would hope that it would increase that participation rate basically."

Two concerns

1. Getting the appropriate numbers of people to participate in e-consultation is a critical problem for consulters. This was also a concern for The Wheel team.
2. However, an additional concern was the the Community's and Voluntary sector's access to technology, such as computers/PCs, internet and mobile phones: "It is recognised that as a sector, there are limitations and challenges in so far as many people operating in the sector do not have access…So us as the Wheel would like to explore this area, we do have reservations about whether or not people will be able to participate. But if we can share the burden of that quest with Maynooth or Queens University then of course, we are willing to embark on it."

The Consultees

The research team studied the group of potential consultees.

A number of representatives from the Community and Voluntary sector agreed to take part in a survey in order to gauge expectations for engaging in the e-consultation. These participants were initially contacted by e-mail, using the Wheel’s membership mailing list.

Access and Experience

All participants had access to computers and the Internet. The majority of participants had at least some previous experience of engaging in public consultations. Instances of these experiences include:

• attending meetings representing a community partnership—representatives from Dept of

community and family affairs in attendance…’

• Devleoping a 'Model' of good consultation. This was tested on the Co. Monaghan Heritage

Plan’

• Producing a detailed response to consultation on Town and Local Development Plans.

Mixed feelings about consultations

• Negative: Some participants felt that the experience was largely negative.

"We have never seen any tangible change in plans by our doing so."

Another commented:

"Initially felt good and that we were being listened to; however deeper into the process it felt to me as if the local authority was just checking off the public consultation box."

• Positive: "Very positive. Effective consultation is imperative for PAUL Partnership. As an area-based partnership company it is vital that PAUL's strategies and programmes are validated by consultation with all partners and the community and voluntary sector in particular. It is also a central goal of the Partnership to ensure that the voice of the community is enabled to be heard at wider fora for decision-making in social inclusion, local and community development and local governance."

Making the consultation easier for contributors

Respondents were asked to list any other resources that would be necessary in order to make participation in consultation easier. Some suggests are as follows:

• inter agency consultation with state bodies
• excellent and sustainable networking pathways between stakeholders
• more power in decision making as to when, where etc., meeting are held.
• more evidence that consultation makes any difference

The most important factors were:

• higher proficiency in technology
• more skills training

Significantly, the need for more financial and personnel resources were viewed as less important.

Consultee Expectations

Next, respondents were asked to state the type of expectations they had from the e-consultation. Responses included:

• experience of e-consultation and how it works as a form of communications
• clearer picture of how to use e-mail and internet to promote and advance their projects
• to receive feed back on the results received and information as to how the results will be used.
• consultation with prupose and beneficial outcome: "Mindless consultation and lack of credibility can often be the reason for lack of future participation. If ones view is not given proper consideration or acknowledgement the incentive certainly decreases to participate in future."
• that real volunteers will be listened to and catered for
• free, easily accessibility for all people would be addressed
• allowing (for exmaple) local parish halls or other community facilities to have a 'hub' where anyone can access and have their issues or ideas heard. Fro exmaple: "Women, children and those usually not at the table making decision that effect their lives should be especially thought of during the consultation process."
• it will make sensible and usable recommendations with regard to the form, and use of

electronic surveying, so that real effects can be derived from it

• lessons learned about potential of e-consultation methodologies
• that one's views will be heard and taken into account
• to be able to learn techniques for divining public opinion without having to spend a lot of money
• will make sensible and usable recommendations with regard to the form, and use of

electronic surveying, so that real effects can be derived from it.

Respondents were then asked to articulate expected outcomes from the processes. These included:

• to identify ways in which other voluntary organisations can use e-technologies to 1) effectively communicate with and harness the views of the community sector as well as 2) identify ways in which that sector can avail of the potential for consultation, make its voice heard and overcome the risk of digital exclusion
• positive change will happen - that new technologies will enable greater ease of access to

peoples opinions and ideas

• to be able to use the resources currently held to better effect
• to be able to identify what we need to more effectively communicate/canvass opinion among users' target audiences.
• better proficiency with internet
• advice on how to internet to users' advantage
• free easy access to technology to allow all people of the community to have their issues aired.
• special attention to those usually absent from the decision making process
• to make the e-consultaiton process fun
• allow local—grass roots projects access to the same resources that recognised organisations/charities enjoy