Difference between revisions of "Probation Board of Northern Ireland"
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
===[[Designing an e-consultation interface for ex-offenders]]=== | ===[[Designing an e-consultation interface for ex-offenders]]=== | ||
| + | Several technologies were considered usable by people with reading and writing difficulties. | ||
| + | These used voice, mobile text, or graphical interfaces over the Internet. We chose a high-graphics, low text interface to explore the extent of use by ex-offenders. Also, since the PBNI consultation was about the location of probation offices, we chose to use a geographical, map-based interface. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [http://maps.google.co.uk Google Maps' (maps.google.co.uk)] Applicaiton Programme Interface was used, which lets website developers to use their maps in their own applications. | ||
===[[Designing a usability test]]=== | ===[[Designing a usability test]]=== | ||
Revision as of 18:28, 13 January 2008
Contents
Overview
E-consultation is often criticized on the grounds that different groups of people do not have equal access to electronic communications technologies. However, in our modern times, this criticism is a weak one.
E-consultation techniques are complementary to traditional approaches, and seek to improve participation.
In this case example we discuss what can be done to improve accessibility and usability for groups, who may be otherwise excluded from e-consultation.
Probation Board of Northern Ireland Consultation
In 2005, the PBNI were faced with consdierable structural change. They wished to consult widely on the changes to local probation office locations, and reporting centres, across Northern Ireland.
The PBNI sought opinions from several partner groups, political parties, councillors, community groups, and Individual offenders.
The PBNI drew learning from previous consultations. The most signficant challenge was engaging with offenders who had a low literacy, numeracy and other learning difficulties. However, it was recognised that, regardless, such stakeholders were very capable of texting using their mobile phones.
The project team suggested a number of technologies that could be used in their consultations with organisations.
PBNI consultation managers then spent some time over the autumn of 2005 on designing and planning the consultation, with the help of the Consultation Institute (represented by Stratagem in Ireland).
The Consultation Institute pointed out the disadvantages of consulting on only one out of nine options (i.e. ex-offenders). In addition, the PBNI needed approval from the its corporate managers, board, and the Northern Ireland Office, which created a long delay.
In the end, the PBNI ran a conventional consultation, without any e-consultation component, between 10 March and 2 June 2006. Rather than introducing a new technology for consulting with offenders during this major consultation, they agreed to work with us to do a usability test of an e-consultation technology with ex-offenders.
Designing an e-consultation interface for ex-offenders
Several technologies were considered usable by people with reading and writing difficulties. These used voice, mobile text, or graphical interfaces over the Internet. We chose a high-graphics, low text interface to explore the extent of use by ex-offenders. Also, since the PBNI consultation was about the location of probation offices, we chose to use a geographical, map-based interface.
Google Maps' (maps.google.co.uk) Applicaiton Programme Interface was used, which lets website developers to use their maps in their own applications.
Designing a usability test
Designing a usability test of an e-consultation interface for ex-offenders
